<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usability and Robustness Issues of Yahoo Pipes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dontai.com/wp/2009/02/13/usability-robustness-issues-yahoo-pipes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dontai.com/wp/2009/02/13/usability-robustness-issues-yahoo-pipes/</link>
	<description>Have Lemons, Make Lemonade</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 18:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Ing</title>
		<link>http://dontai.com/wp/2009/02/13/usability-robustness-issues-yahoo-pipes/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dontai.com/wp/?p=463#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised that you&#039;re having problems with RSS.  Way back when I hadn&#039;t been blogging for long -- &lt;a&gt;Blogspot problems, way back in March 2006!&lt;/a&gt; -- I discovered that RSS isn&#039;t the best specified protocol.  

From listening to podcasts, my understanding is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(standard)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Atom&lt;/a&gt; is a well-designed standard, much better than RSS 2.0 .  That being said, an Atom feed isn&#039;t always available and my experience is that there&#039;s sometimes issues with getting an Atom feed recognized by offline feed readers.  

I don&#039;t know Yahoo Pipes well, but see that Yahoo says &lt;a href=&quot;http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/docs?doc=overview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pipes offers output in RSS 2.0, RSS 1.0 (RDF), JSON and Atom formats for maximum flexibility&lt;/a&gt;.  I wasn&#039;t sure which you chose to aggregate into Google -- or if it makes a difference -- which is exactly the sort of detail that I&#039;ve been ducking by not engaging with the mashup tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that you&#8217;re having problems with RSS.  Way back when I hadn&#8217;t been blogging for long &#8212; <a>Blogspot problems, way back in March 2006!</a> &#8212; I discovered that RSS isn&#8217;t the best specified protocol.  </p>
<p>From listening to podcasts, my understanding is that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(standard)" rel="nofollow">Atom</a> is a well-designed standard, much better than RSS 2.0 .  That being said, an Atom feed isn&#8217;t always available and my experience is that there&#8217;s sometimes issues with getting an Atom feed recognized by offline feed readers.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know Yahoo Pipes well, but see that Yahoo says <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/docs?doc=overview" rel="nofollow">Pipes offers output in RSS 2.0, RSS 1.0 (RDF), JSON and Atom formats for maximum flexibility</a>.  I wasn&#8217;t sure which you chose to aggregate into Google &#8212; or if it makes a difference &#8212; which is exactly the sort of detail that I&#8217;ve been ducking by not engaging with the mashup tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

